Unit IV PowerPoint Presentation Create a five- to seven-slide PowerPoint presentation on the EPA’s human health risk assessment process. Your presentation should include speaker’s notes that narrate the presentation as if you were in front of an audience. Use the EPA’s Risk Assessment Portal to access the information you will need to complete your presentation. You may include other sources as you see fit. To find the Risk Assessment Portal, use your favorite search engine to access the EPA Web site (http://www.epa.gov/). Once on the site, type “Step 1 – Hazard Identification” (without quotes). The first site listed should be the one you want. Click on it, and you will see Step 1 of the process. To go to Step 2, click on the link at the bottom of the page. Steps 3 and 4 will follow Steps 2 and 3 in the same way. Be sure to use your own words in your presentation, and include graphics to create visually interesting slides. Include a slide that lists all of your sources in APA format. Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Some grading and scoring information…..
Level 1 – Unsatisfactory
Level 2 – Needs Improvement
Level 3 – Satisfactory
Level 4 – Good
Level 5 – Excellent
Originality Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Presentation repeats other people’s ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on a few slides.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Presentation is mostly original and inventive. Much of the content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Presentation shows originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
Background Points Range: 0 (0%) – 8 (8%) Background often makes seeing text difficult and may visually compete with graphics on the page.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Background is occasionally not complementary to text and graphics. Background use is somewhat consistent and appropriate for the topic.
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) Background is sometimes complementary to text and graphics. Background use is somewhat consistent and appropriate for the topic.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Background mostly complements text and graphics. Background use is fairly consistent and appropriate for the topic.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Background complements text and graphics. Background use is consistent and appropriate for the topic. Text-Font choice and Formatting (i.e., color, bold italics, etc.)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 8 (8%) Font choice and/or formatting often make reading the text difficult.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Font choice and/or formatting may sometimes cause text to be somewhat difficult to read.
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) Font choice and formatting sometimes enhance readability.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Font choice and formatting enhance readability in most of the presentation.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Font choice and formatting have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
Sequencing of Information Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) There seems to be little to no clear plan for the organization of information. Information may be poorly sequenced and/or irrelevant to the topic.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Information seems to be somewhat logically sequenced, but several slides or items of information may seem to be out of sequence and/or irrelevant.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Much of the information is logically sequenced. A few slides or items of information may seem to be out of place and/or slightly irrelevant.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Most information is organized clearly and logically. One or two slides or items of information may seem slightly out of place and/or slightly irrelevant to the topic.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Information is organized clearly and logically. Slides and items of information are relevant and sequential, making it easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next slide.
Use of Graphics Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Several graphics are inappropriate and/or unattractive, and they detract from the content of the presentation.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) A few graphics may be unattractive, and a few do not seem to support the theme and content of the presentation.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) All graphics are attractive, but a few do not seem to support the theme and content of the presentation.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Most of the graphics are appropriate and attractive and support the theme and content of the presentation.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) All graphics are appropriate and attractive and support the theme and content of the presentation.
References and Citations Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (5%) Very few to no sources are referenced and cited; use of proper APA format is seldom, if ever, evident.
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Several errors are present in references and citations. Some references and citations may be missing. An attempt to use APA format is evident.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Some errors are present in references and citations. One reference or citation may be missing. Use of APA format is somewhat correct, but errors are evident.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Minor errors may be present in references and citations. Use of APA format is mostly correct.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) All sources are correctly referenced and cited using proper APA format.
Name:GradingRubricPowerPointPresentation
Click here to order this paper @Essaybay.net. The Ultimate Custom Paper Writing Service
No comments:
Post a Comment